
Imagine this: a young analyst sits in a high-rise office in Sydney, pitching an idea he had spent weeks refining. There’s graphs, funnels, and a mountain of data. Yet, halfway through the presentation, a senior executive interrupts with a simple question: “What’s the 20 percent here?”
The 80/20 rule is one of those concepts that gets nods in meetings and appearances in productivity books, but few people truly live by it. It’s easy to talk about prioritising, but harder to face what that actually means in practice.
Applying the rule isn’t about efficiency, it’s about honesty. It forces us to recognise that much of what they do doesn’t matter. That most meetings are habitual. That many habits are distractions dressed up as discipline.
The rule doesn’t just cut through workload - it cuts through our ego. It challenges the belief that effort alone creates value and confronts the tendency to equate motion with meaning.
Culturally, most systems reward the opposite of 80/20 thinking. In school students are taught to cover every chapter and every page. At work, employees are encouraged to attend every meeting and stay visibly busy. In life, the message is that trying harder is always better. But these systems rarely teach the skill that matters most - knowing what to ignore. Even in data-rich roles like analysis, where clarity should lead the way, analysts often find themselves pressured to optimise for visibility over value, chasing metrics that look good on a dashboard but have little effect on real behaviour.
It’s easier to feel productive than to take responsibility for what doesn’t work. The illusion of progress becomes more comforting than the risk of clarity.
So what can you do? The real breakthrough comes when you ask yourself what you’re avoiding by staying busy. The answer is very often quite simple - clarity. Clarity demands tradeoffs. It forces choices that feel risky because they strip away the safety of multitasking and self-image. Letting go of the identity of the high-achiever or the multitasker feels like failure, but it’s often the first step toward doing what actually matters.
Many cling to the 80 percent because it’s familiar. It feels safer to be moderately successful at many things than to risk falling short at one. The 80/20 rule forces a different calculation on oneself. One that favours fewer actions with higher stakes. It’s not a tactic, it’s a test. It asks people to stop performing and start choosing. The real challenge is not deciding between success and failure, but rather choosing between noise and focus.
Between doing what looks right and doing what works.
So the next time life feels cluttered, don’t ask what needs adding. Ask what can be dropped. The answer might make work more productive, but more than that, it might make life more freeing. Because clarity isn’t about having all the answers. It’s about finally knowing what no longer deserves your attention.